I recall a conversation with Herb from first semester about the "romantic" nature of streetcars verses buses. One of the reason that streetcars are successful and view as more desirable than buses is the tangible system they provide. For example, if someone living in an urban environment along a bus route looks out the window of their apartment, they may or may not see the bus. If the bus is not there, there is no indication that the bus system exists. However, if a streetcar system is in place, and one were to look out the window, the tracks and wires would be visible. This tangible infrastructure is a grounded and recognizable system. it creates a psychological reaction in knowing that whie the streetcar itself is not outside the building, the systems are in place to keep that person connected.
Creating a suburban transportation hub requires the same thinking. Without a station or a visible, permanent precense, the bus will never be a desired mode of transportation. There must be a tangible and understandable place when commuters know they can go to access transportation.
These forms are preliminary and general, but the sequence of space is outlined. When we encounter space that is broken into various sections, movement is created. Paths, threshold and destinations become design elements. Likewise, functions are clearly identified. Cars function in car areas, people in people areas, and buses in bus areas.
The pedestrian path from the lot to the building entrance is the commuter's first experience within the site. Typical parking lots are single aprons where cars and people share the same paths. This leads to cars becoming congested as they must loiter behind people who are walking. Obviously, there is a safety issue as well. A seperate path for pedestrians begins the spatial expereince. Perhaps there is some type of covering, not completely sheltered, but semi pervious to light, rain, etc. This path leads the commuter to the entry plaza and eventually the building interior.
No comments:
Post a Comment